Machine matching
Jaw, cone, impact, and screen recommendations are narrowed by feed size, abrasiveness, desired product split, mobility, and site power assumptions.
Falcon's minimal-efficient capability page is designed for buyers who want the practical limits first. We summarize what the team can support, what data is required, and how the recommendation moves from inquiry to quote. The purpose is not to hide complexity; it is to put the complexity in the correct order so engineering, procurement, and operations can work from the same brief.
Jaw, cone, impact, and screen recommendations are narrowed by feed size, abrasiveness, desired product split, mobility, and site power assumptions.
Falcon identifies whether a request needs a single machine, a staged mobile spread, or a more formal plant engineering review.
Wear and service items are grouped around planned shutdown intervals to reduce fragmented purchasing and emergency freight.
Missing information is requested in short, specific questions so the commercial response can be compared internally without guesswork.
When this information is available, Falcon can move quickly. When it is missing, we do not fill the gap with a broad claim. We ask for the smallest missing data point and explain why it matters. This keeps the recommendation useful for operations and credible for procurement. It also helps avoid the common problem of comparing two quotes that were based on different assumptions about the same duty.